SANJAY KUMAR vs MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI — WPMS/1595/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010091462026
Filing Number
WPMS/4761/2026
Filing Date
27-05-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1595/2026
Registration Date
27-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAY KUMAR
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPMS/1595/2026 Case: Sanjay Kumar v. Mukhya Nagar Adhikari Nagar Nigam Haridwar (High Court of Uttarakhand, 30 May 2026) Decision: The court disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by contractors claiming unpaid dues for completed civil works executed for Nagar Nigam Haridwar during 2024-2025. Rather than granting a mandamus for immediate payment with 18% interest as sought, the court allowed petitioners to submit fresh representations within two weeks, directing the respondent municipality to consider and decide these within eight weeks by passing reasoned orders in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPMS/1595/2026 Case: Sanjay Kumar v. Mukhya Nagar Adhikari Nagar Nigam Haridwar (High Court of Uttarakhand, 30 May 2026) Decision: The court disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by contractors claiming unpaid dues for completed civil works executed for Nagar Nigam Haridwar during 2024-2025. Rather than granting a mandamus for immediate payment with 18% interest as sought, the court allowed petitioners to submit fresh representations within two weeks, directing the respondent municipality to consider and decide these within eight weeks by passing reasoned orders in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts