SANJAY KUMAR vs MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI — WPMS/1589/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010091402026

Filing Number

WPMS/4757/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1589/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY KUMAR

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA,RAMESH NAINWAL,RAMESH NAINWAL, ,RAMESH NAINWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI

  2. 2.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

    Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS/1589/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by construction contractors against Nagar Nigam Haridwar for non-payment of dues. The petitioners had completed civil works during 2024-2025 but remained unpaid despite completion. Rather than issuing a mandamus for immediate payment with 18% interest as sought, the court directed petitioners to submit fresh representations within two weeks, which the Nagar Nigam must decide within eight weeks by passing reasoned orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1589/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1589/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by construction contractors against Nagar Nigam Haridwar for non-payment of dues. The petitioners had completed civil works during 2024-2025 but remained unpaid despite completion. Rather than issuing a mandamus for immediate payment with 18% interest as sought, the court directed petitioners to submit fresh representations within two weeks, which the Nagar Nigam must decide within eight weeks by passing reasoned orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case