SANJAY KUMAR vs MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI — WPMS/1592/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010091392026
Filing Number
WPMS/4756/2026
Filing Date
27-05-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1592/2026
Registration Date
27-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAY KUMAR
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA,RAMESH NAINWAL,RAMESH NAINWAL, ,RAMESH NAINWAL
Respondent(s)
MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPMS/1592/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of multiple consolidated writ petitions by directing Sanjay Kumar and other petitioners to submit fresh representations to Nagar Nigam Haridwar within two weeks. The respondent Municipal Corporation must then consider and decide these representations within eight weeks by passing reasoned orders in accordance with law. Key Facts: Petitioners completed civil works awarded by Nagar Nigam Haridwar during 2024-2025 but remained unpaid despite completion. They initially sought a mandamus directing payment with 18% per annum interest. Reasoning: The court, with consent from both parties, adopted a softer approach in the interest of justice rather than issuing a direct mandamus, granting petitioners an opportunity for administrative reconsideration before the Municipal Corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPMS/1592/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of multiple consolidated writ petitions by directing Sanjay Kumar and other petitioners to submit fresh representations to Nagar Nigam Haridwar within two weeks. The respondent Municipal Corporation must then consider and decide these representations within eight weeks by passing reasoned orders in accordance with law. Key Facts: Petitioners completed civil works awarded by Nagar Nigam Haridwar during 2024-2025 but remained unpaid despite completion. They initially sought a mandamus directing payment with 18% per annum interest. Reasoning: The court, with consent from both parties, adopted a softer approach in the interest of justice rather than issuing a direct mandamus, granting petitioners an opportunity for administrative reconsideration before the Municipal Corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts