DR JAI KUMAR vs UTTARAKHAND INFORMATION COMMISSION — WPMS/1583/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010091232026
Filing Number
WPMS/4744/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1583/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR JAI KUMAR
Adv. SAGAR KOTHARI,SUNAYNA KOHLI KOTHARI,SUNAYNA KOHLI KOTHARI, ,SUNAYNA KOHLI KOTHARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.UTTARAKHAND INFORMATION COMMISSION
-
2.PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
Adv. C K SHARMA
-
3.DEPARTMENT APPELLATE OFFICER
Adv. C K SHARMA
-
4.VEER CHANDRA SINGH GARHWALI
Adv. C K SHARMA
-
5.DR AMAN BHARDWAJ
Case History
-
27-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Jul-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
27-Jul-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
30-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPMS/1583/2026 Dr. Jai Kumar challenged the Chief Information Commissioner's order allowing the medical institute to conduct a fresh plagiarism inquiry into his student's thesis. The court found merit in his argument that the Information Commission exceeded its jurisdiction by directing a new inquiry. The court suspended the portion of the impugned order permitting the fresh inquiry, issued notice to respondents returnable in six weeks, and listed the matter for 27.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1583/2026
Case Summary: WPMS/1583/2026 Dr. Jai Kumar challenged the Chief Information Commissioner's order allowing the medical institute to conduct a fresh plagiarism inquiry into his student's thesis. The court found merit in his argument that the Information Commission exceeded its jurisdiction by directing a new inquiry. The court suspended the portion of the impugned order permitting the fresh inquiry, issued notice to respondents returnable in six weeks, and listed the matter for 27.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts