PRADEEP BARTHWAL vs KAMAL SINGH — CLCON/310/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010091002026

Filing Number

CLCON/4738/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

CLCON/310/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEP BARTHWAL

    Adv. C S RAWAT,RAJNI SUPYAL/LATWAL,RAJNI SUPYAL/LATWAL, ,VIVEK KUMAR,RAJNI SUPYAL/LATWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL SINGH

  2. 2.SUSHIL KUMAR

  3. 3.ADITYA GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: CLCON/310/2026 The court rejected Pradeep Barthwal's contempt petition against respondents Kamal Singh, Sushil Kumar, and Aditya Gupta. The petitioner alleged the respondents violated a March 2023 status quo order by issuing two eviction notices. Justice Pankaj Purohit held that merely issuing notices does not constitute contempt and no actual order violation occurred, as no possession recovery had taken place. The petition was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  4. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/310/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CLCON/310/2026 The court rejected Pradeep Barthwal's contempt petition against respondents Kamal Singh, Sushil Kumar, and Aditya Gupta. The petitioner alleged the respondents violated a March 2023 status quo order by issuing two eviction notices. Justice Pankaj Purohit held that merely issuing notices does not constitute contempt and no actual order violation occurred, as no possession recovery had taken place. The petition was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case