MOHD ADNAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/981/2026

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 16/17,3/4. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010090992026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPCRL/4361/2026

Filing Date

26-05-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/981/2026

Registration Date

26-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 16/17,3/4

Petitioner(s)

MOHD ADNAN

Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,HANEEF AHMAD,HANEEF AHMAD, ,HANEEF AHMAD

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

NAVEEN CHANDRA PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

29-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

10-06-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

12-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

02-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: WPCRL 981/2026 The petition by Mohd Adnan against the State of Uttarakhand was adjourned. The petitioner, who had previously failed to appear before the Investigating Officer despite receiving notice under Section 35-A of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, appeared on 08.06.2026 and his statement was recorded. The State was granted four weeks to file a counter affidavit, with the case listed for further hearing in due course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL 981/2026 The petition by Mohd Adnan against the State of Uttarakhand was adjourned. The petitioner, who had previously failed to appear before the Investigating Officer despite receiving notice under Section 35-A of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, appeared on 08.06.2026 and his statement was recorded. The State was granted four weeks to file a counter affidavit, with the case listed for further hearing in due course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case