HARIOM SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/188/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010090802026
Filing Number
ABA/4345/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
ABA/188/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARIOM SINGH
Adv. AMIT KAPRI,CHANDRAMAULI SHAH,CHANDRAMAULI SHAH, ,CHANDRAMAULI SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/188/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Hariom Singh, accused of abetting suicide under Section 108 BNS in connection with a death case. The court found insufficient evidence of any specific act of instigation, intentional aid, or active participation by the applicant, noting that mere mention of his name in a suicide note (dated ten days before the death) without corroborating evidence of harassment or cruelty was inadequate to establish the essential ingredients of abetment. The bail was granted on conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, regular court appearances, and maintenance of good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
02-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/188/2026
Case Summary: ABA/188/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Hariom Singh, accused of abetting suicide under Section 108 BNS in connection with a death case. The court found insufficient evidence of any specific act of instigation, intentional aid, or active participation by the applicant, noting that mere mention of his name in a suicide note (dated ten days before the death) without corroborating evidence of harassment or cruelty was inadequate to establish the essential ingredients of abetment. The bail was granted on conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, regular court appearances, and maintenance of good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts