CHURAMANI BRIJWASHI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/971/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010090182026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4321/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/971/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHURAMANI BRIJWASHI

    Adv. LALIT SHARMA,SURAIYA NAAZ,SURAIYA NAAZ, ,SURAIYA NAAZ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.OFFICER INCHARGE

    Adv. G.A.

  4. 4.BHUWAN CHANDRA BRIJWASHI

  5. 5.ISHWARI DUTT

  6. 6.SUB INSPECTOR MAHENDRA RAJ SINGH

  7. 7.REVENUE INSPECTOR HEM CHANDRA JOSHI

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    The case was adjourned to 03.06.2026. The court directed the State counsel to obtain instructions from respondent no. 3 (Senior Superintendent of Police) regarding threats allegedly being made to the 75-year-old petitioner by respondents 4 and 5, with orders that the concerned officer take immediate steps if threats are substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/971/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case was adjourned to 03.06.2026. The court directed the State counsel to obtain instructions from respondent no. 3 (Senior Superintendent of Police) regarding threats allegedly being made to the 75-year-old petitioner by respondents 4 and 5, with orders that the concerned officer take immediate steps if threats are substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case