SANJAY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1145/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,75,351(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 29th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010089532026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528/4290/2026

Filing Date

25-05-2026

Registration No

C528/1145/2026

Registration Date

25-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

29th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,75,351(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 9(N),10

Petitioner(s)

SANJAY

Adv. TAPAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

KIRTI CHAWLA

Adv. SANJAY KUMAR CHANDEL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

27-05-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

29-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

The court allowed the compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings against Sanjay (accused stepfather) in a sexual assault case. The complainant, now married to a third party, denied the allegations were true and stated they were filed under false impression regarding her relationship opposition; with parties reaching settlement, the court found conviction remote and continuation would cause injustice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings against Sanjay (accused stepfather) in a sexual assault case. The complainant, now married to a third party, denied the allegations were true and stated they were filed under false impression regarding her relationship opposition; with parties reaching settlement, the court found conviction remote and continuation would cause injustice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case