SAURABH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,MENKA TRIPATHI — ABA/184/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,191(2),191(3),351(2),61(2). Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

CNR: UKHC010089372026

Filing Number

ABA/4284/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

ABA/184/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,191(2),191(3),351(2),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAURABH

    Adv. ANKURIT RAJ DAVID,MUKESH KUMAR KAPARUWAN,MUKESH KUMAR KAPARUWAN, ,MUKESH KUMAR KAPARUWAN

  2. 2.ABDUL KADIR

  3. 3.AMAN SAINI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,MENKA TRIPATHI

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jul-2026

    Bail Order Matters (After Fresh) -254

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  3. 15-Jul-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    In ABA No. 184 of 2026, Hon'ble Justice Alok Mahra adjourned the case to 20.07.2026. The State of Uttarakhand was granted three weeks to file its objection, and any interim order previously issued was extended until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  6. 03-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  7. 27-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In ABA No. 184 of 2026, Hon'ble Justice Alok Mahra adjourned the case to 20.07.2026. The State of Uttarakhand was granted three weeks to file its objection, and any interim order previously issued was extended until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case