JITENDRA KUMAR PRATEEK TRIPATHI(LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/901/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010089332026

Filing Number

BA1/4282/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

BA1/901/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA KUMAR PRATEEK TRIPATHI(LEGAL AID)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: BA1/901/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Jitendra Kumar, who was in judicial custody on drug trafficking charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court found that since the co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench, the applicant was entitled to parity in bail treatment. The court released the applicant on personal bond with two sureties, without expressing any opinion on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/901/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/901/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Jitendra Kumar, who was in judicial custody on drug trafficking charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court found that since the co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench, the applicant was entitled to parity in bail treatment. The court released the applicant on personal bond with two sureties, without expressing any opinion on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case