VIVIEK SHARMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C482/1001/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) Section 386. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010088982021

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

C482/5131/2021

Filing Date

31-07-2021

Registration No

C482/1001/2021

Registration Date

31-07-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) Section 386

Petitioner(s)

VIVIEK SHARMA

Adv. ADITYA SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

S.H.O. P.S. S.I.D.C.U.L. DISTT HARIDWAR

ANIL SAINIK

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

02-08-2021

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

09-01-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

03-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -24

25-09-2024

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

27-09-2021

ADMISSION MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -30

Orders

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Case Summary: C482/1001/2021 - VIVIEK SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND A Correction Application (IA No.6 of 2026) was allowed by Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani. The court corrected a clerical error in its previous order dated 19.12.2025, substituting the police station name in paragraph 3 from an incorrectly stated name to "Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar." The case is listed for further proceedings in due course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C482/1001/2021 - VIVIEK SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND A Correction Application (IA No.6 of 2026) was allowed by Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani. The court corrected a clerical error in its previous order dated 19.12.2025, substituting the police station name in paragraph 3 from an incorrectly stated name to "Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar." The case is listed for further proceedings in due course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case