KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1120/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010087712026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
C528/4190/2026
Filing Date
22-05-2026
Registration No
C528/1120/2026
Registration Date
22-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KULDEEP NANDRAJOG
Adv. SHARANG DHULIA
ANJALI TYAGI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
JOGINDER SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 01-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/1120/2026 The court issued a stay order on criminal proceedings against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi in a real estate dispute involving Octagon Builders' housing scheme. Judge Alok Mahra granted a stay of Criminal Case No.3932/2024 pending before the Haridwar Magistrate until the next hearing, finding that the dispute involves contractual remedies (arbitration clause), the builder is in liquidation, and no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as required by law. Notice was issued to respondent and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/1120/2026 The court issued a stay order on criminal proceedings against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi in a real estate dispute involving Octagon Builders' housing scheme. Judge Alok Mahra granted a stay of Criminal Case No.3932/2024 pending before the Haridwar Magistrate until the next hearing, finding that the dispute involves contractual remedies (arbitration clause), the builder is in liquidation, and no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as required by law. Notice was issued to respondent and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts