KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1117/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010087662026
Filing Number
C528/4187/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
C528/1117/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULDEEP NANDRAJOG
Adv. SHARANG DHULIA
-
2.ANJALI TYAGI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SH. VIJAY KUMAR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: C528/1117/2026 The Court issued a stay order on the criminal proceedings. Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi challenged an FIR lodged on 12.10.2023 regarding an allegedly undelivered plot in a housing scheme. The applicants argued the dispute is contractual (governed by an arbitration clause), the company is in liquidation under court supervision, and no preliminary inquiry was conducted as mandatorily required. Justice Alok Mahra granted a stay of further criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.3950 of 2024) pending the next hearing and directed notice to the complainant, with the matter to be listed after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
26-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C528/1117/2026
Case Summary: C528/1117/2026 The Court issued a stay order on the criminal proceedings. Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi challenged an FIR lodged on 12.10.2023 regarding an allegedly undelivered plot in a housing scheme. The applicants argued the dispute is contractual (governed by an arbitration clause), the company is in liquidation under court supervision, and no preliminary inquiry was conducted as mandatorily required. Justice Alok Mahra granted a stay of further criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.3950 of 2024) pending the next hearing and directed notice to the complainant, with the matter to be listed after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts