KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1119/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010087642026
Filing Number
C528/4185/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
C528/1119/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULDEEP NANDRAJOG
Adv. SHARANG DHULIA
-
2.ANJALI TYAGI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SMT. RAMA SHARMA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: C528/1119/2026 The High Court stayed criminal proceedings against Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi arising from an FIR lodged by Rama Sharma regarding a property dispute over a plot in Octagon Builders' housing scheme in Haridwar. The court found the dispute to be contractual in nature governed by an arbitration clause, noted the company had been liquidated since 2018 leaving applicants without independent control, and held that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as mandated by Supreme Court precedent. The court issued notice to the complainant, stayed further proceedings in the trial court pending next hearing, and directed listing after service reports received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
26-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C528/1119/2026
Case Summary: C528/1119/2026 The High Court stayed criminal proceedings against Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi arising from an FIR lodged by Rama Sharma regarding a property dispute over a plot in Octagon Builders' housing scheme in Haridwar. The court found the dispute to be contractual in nature governed by an arbitration clause, noted the company had been liquidated since 2018 leaving applicants without independent control, and held that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as mandated by Supreme Court precedent. The court issued notice to the complainant, stayed further proceedings in the trial court pending next hearing, and directed listing after service reports received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts