KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1111/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420,427. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010087542026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

C528/4181/2026

Filing Date

22-05-2026

Registration No

C528/1111/2026

Registration Date

22-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420,427

Petitioner(s)

KULDEEP NANDRAJOG

Adv. SHARANG DHULIA

ANJALI TYAGI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

MRS. SONIYA SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

26-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

01-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

01-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: C528/1111/2026 The court issued a stay on criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.687 of 2025) against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi pending before the Haridwar magistrate. The applicants challenged an FIR lodged for alleged non-delivery of a plot in a housing scheme, contending the dispute is contractual/commercial (governed by arbitration clause) rather than criminal, and that the builder company has been liquidated since 2018. The court directed notice to respondent no.2 and adjourned the matter for further hearing after service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1111/2026 The court issued a stay on criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.687 of 2025) against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi pending before the Haridwar magistrate. The applicants challenged an FIR lodged for alleged non-delivery of a plot in a housing scheme, contending the dispute is contractual/commercial (governed by arbitration clause) rather than criminal, and that the builder company has been liquidated since 2018. The court directed notice to respondent no.2 and adjourned the matter for further hearing after service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case