KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1111/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420,427. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010087542026
Filing Number
C528/4181/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
C528/1111/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULDEEP NANDRAJOG
Adv. SHARANG DHULIA
-
2.ANJALI TYAGI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.MRS. SONIYA SHARMA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: C528/1111/2026 The court issued a stay on criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.687 of 2025) against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi pending before the Haridwar magistrate. The applicants challenged an FIR lodged for alleged non-delivery of a plot in a housing scheme, contending the dispute is contractual/commercial (governed by arbitration clause) rather than criminal, and that the builder company has been liquidated since 2018. The court directed notice to respondent no.2 and adjourned the matter for further hearing after service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
26-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C528/1111/2026
Case Summary: C528/1111/2026 The court issued a stay on criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.687 of 2025) against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi pending before the Haridwar magistrate. The applicants challenged an FIR lodged for alleged non-delivery of a plot in a housing scheme, contending the dispute is contractual/commercial (governed by arbitration clause) rather than criminal, and that the builder company has been liquidated since 2018. The court directed notice to respondent no.2 and adjourned the matter for further hearing after service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts