RAM PRAKASH YADAV vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPPIL/72/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010087462026

Filing Number

WPMS/4566/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

WPPIL/72/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM PRAKASH YADAV

    Adv. C K SHARMA,NITIN TEWARI,NITIN TEWARI, ,NITIN TEWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.DM

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.S D M

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.TEHSILDAR

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of the PIL after the State confirmed that illegal encroachments on Prikrama Marg (Khatoni Khata plot 75) had been removed following the petitioner's complaint. The court issued an observation directing the State to prevent future encroachments and take requisite preventive measures, rendering further directions unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPPIL/72/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of the PIL after the State confirmed that illegal encroachments on Prikrama Marg (Khatoni Khata plot 75) had been removed following the petitioner's complaint. The court issued an observation directing the State to prevent future encroachments and take requisite preventive measures, rendering further directions unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case