BAJAJ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD vs SAROJ DEVI — AO/187/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.

CNR: UKHC010087132026

Next Hearing

06th August 2026

Filing Number

AO/4546/2026

Filing Date

21-05-2026

Registration No

AO/187/2026

Registration Date

21-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173

Petitioner(s)

BAJAJ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

Adv. PRAMOD BAILWAL, ,YOGESH UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

SAROJ DEVI

ANJALI SRIVASTAV

MAMTA

HIMANSHU

BRAHMANAND KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

29-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

06-08-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

29-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Case Summary: AO/187/2026 Bajaj General Insurance Company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award was admitted. The court ordered the appellant to deposit the full awarded amount before the MACT within one month (after adjusting statutory deposits already made), to be placed in a high-interest recurring term deposit in a nationalized bank without disbursement permission from the court. Execution of the award remains stayed pending compliance with the deposit order. The matter is listed for 06.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO/187/2026 Bajaj General Insurance Company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award was admitted. The court ordered the appellant to deposit the full awarded amount before the MACT within one month (after adjusting statutory deposits already made), to be placed in a high-interest recurring term deposit in a nationalized bank without disbursement permission from the court. Execution of the award remains stayed pending compliance with the deposit order. The matter is listed for 06.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case