BAJAJ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD vs SAROJ DEVI — AO/187/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.

Next hearing 06-Aug-2026

CNR: UKHC010087132026

Filing Number

AO/4546/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

AO/187/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

    Adv. PRAMOD BAILWAL, ,YOGESH UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAROJ DEVI

  2. 2.ANJALI SRIVASTAV

  3. 3.MAMTA

  4. 4.HIMANSHU

  5. 5.BRAHMANAND KUMAR

Case History

  1. 06-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Aug-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

  3. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: AO/187/2026 Bajaj General Insurance Company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award was admitted. The court ordered the appellant to deposit the full awarded amount before the MACT within one month (after adjusting statutory deposits already made), to be placed in a high-interest recurring term deposit in a nationalized bank without disbursement permission from the court. Execution of the award remains stayed pending compliance with the deposit order. The matter is listed for 06.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO/187/2026 Bajaj General Insurance Company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award was admitted. The court ordered the appellant to deposit the full awarded amount before the MACT within one month (after adjusting statutory deposits already made), to be placed in a high-interest recurring term deposit in a nationalized bank without disbursement permission from the court. Execution of the award remains stayed pending compliance with the deposit order. The matter is listed for 06.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case