KHUSBU KHOLIYA MEDHA PANDE, SHIVAM SINGH PARGAI,APOORV CHAUHAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528 /849/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 306. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010087092025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528 /4405/2025

Filing Date

13-06-2025

Registration No

C528 /849/2025

Registration Date

13-06-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 306

Petitioner(s)

KHUSBU KHOLIYA MEDHA PANDE, SHIVAM SINGH PARGAI,APOORV CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Adv. G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

LAL SINGH SHAHI

Adv. D S MEHTA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

17-06-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

01-04-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

17-02-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

26-11-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

24-07-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

01-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the applicant charged under Section 306 IPC (abetment to suicide) in connection with her husband's death by hanging. The court found that the prosecution case rested entirely on suspicion without cogent evidence of abetment, noting the absence of any proximate act by the applicant that could have driven the deceased to suicide, the 28-day unexplained delay in lodging the FIR, and that the couple was in a cordial love marriage with a child, contradicting allegations of harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the applicant charged under Section 306 IPC (abetment to suicide) in connection with her husband's death by hanging. The court found that the prosecution case rested entirely on suspicion without cogent evidence of abetment, noting the absence of any proximate act by the applicant that could have driven the deceased to suicide, the 28-day unexplained delay in lodging the FIR, and that the couple was in a cordial love marriage with a child, contradicting allegations of harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case