PRATHAMESH KRISHI VIKAS KENDRIYA SAHKARI SANGH LTD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/1487/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010086652026
Filing Number
WPMS/4520/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1487/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRATHAMESH KRISHI VIKAS KENDRIYA SAHKARI SANGH LTD
Adv. B D PANDE,DR GOVIND SINGH LATWAL,DR GOVIND SINGH LATWAL, ,DR GOVIND SINGH LATWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.STATE COOPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
-
3.DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.DISTRICT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Summary of WPMS No.1487 of 2026: The court disposed of the petition by directing Prathamesh Krishi Vikas Kendriya Sahkari Sangh Ltd., a cooperative society whose term had expired, to file a fresh representation to the State Cooperative Election Authority (respondent no.2) within 24 hours after completing all required formalities. The court ordered respondent no.2 to decide the representation by a reasoned order in accordance with law, but before conducting elections in other cooperative societies, as the petitioner had been wrongly excluded from the election list despite completing all formalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1487/2026
Summary of WPMS No.1487 of 2026: The court disposed of the petition by directing Prathamesh Krishi Vikas Kendriya Sahkari Sangh Ltd., a cooperative society whose term had expired, to file a fresh representation to the State Cooperative Election Authority (respondent no.2) within 24 hours after completing all required formalities. The court ordered respondent no.2 to decide the representation by a reasoned order in accordance with law, but before conducting elections in other cooperative societies, as the petitioner had been wrongly excluded from the election list despite completing all formalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts