LEVIN KUMAR S C BURMAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/1496/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010086612026

Filing Number

WPMS/4517/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1496/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEVIN KUMAR S C BURMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.DM

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.S D M

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    WPMS 1496/2026 - Case Summary The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed Levin Kumar's writ petition seeking mandamus to pluck mangoes from an orchard on land vested with the State Government on 16.02.2023. Justice Pankaj Purohit held the petition misconceived, noting the petitioner had lost all previous litigation on the land dispute, and his prior appeal (Special Appeal 348/2025) was dismissed as not pressed in March 2026, attaining finality when he failed to pursue a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1496/2026

casestatus.in Summary

WPMS 1496/2026 - Case Summary The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed Levin Kumar's writ petition seeking mandamus to pluck mangoes from an orchard on land vested with the State Government on 16.02.2023. Justice Pankaj Purohit held the petition misconceived, noting the petitioner had lost all previous litigation on the land dispute, and his prior appeal (Special Appeal 348/2025) was dismissed as not pressed in March 2026, attaining finality when he failed to pursue a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case