BIRAMWATI S C BURMAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/1485/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010086572026

Filing Number

WPMS/4513/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1485/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIRAMWATI S C BURMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.AAVAS FINANCIERS LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The court dismissed the writ petition filed by Biramwati S C Burman as withdrawn. The petitioner had previously filed the same petition on identical grounds, which was dismissed with a Rs. 10,000 cost imposed (to be recovered as land revenue arrears and deposited to the High Court Bar Association Advocates' Welfare Fund). The current petition was filed without depositing the cost and without permission to file a subsequent petition, warranting dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  5. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1485/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition filed by Biramwati S C Burman as withdrawn. The petitioner had previously filed the same petition on identical grounds, which was dismissed with a Rs. 10,000 cost imposed (to be recovered as land revenue arrears and deposited to the High Court Bar Association Advocates' Welfare Fund). The current petition was filed without depositing the cost and without permission to file a subsequent petition, warranting dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case