MOHD WASIM AND OTHERS vs NAGAR NIGAM HALDWANI Advocate - ASHISH JOSHI — SPA/187/2026

Case under Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section 5. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010086532026

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

SPA/4510/2026

Filing Date

20-05-2026

Registration No

SPA/187/2026

Registration Date

20-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section 5

Petitioner(s)

MOHD WASIM AND OTHERS

Adv. VINAY BHATT,MOHD SHAFY,MOHD SHAFY, ,MOHD SHAFY

Respondent(s)

NAGAR NIGAM HALDWANI Advocate - ASHISH JOSHI

NAGAR AYUKT

Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

26-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

16-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

01-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

27-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

27-05-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
01-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case Summary: SPA /187/2026 The court granted a two-week adjournment to the respondent's counsel to obtain instructions. Critically, the court issued an interim protective order restraining the Municipal Board from evicting the appellants from the disputed premises until the next hearing on 16.06.2026, citing a prior favorable decree obtained by the appellants' grandfather against the Municipal Board regarding the same property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SPA /187/2026 The court granted a two-week adjournment to the respondent's counsel to obtain instructions. Critically, the court issued an interim protective order restraining the Municipal Board from evicting the appellants from the disputed premises until the next hearing on 16.06.2026, citing a prior favorable decree obtained by the appellants' grandfather against the Municipal Board regarding the same property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case