SONI AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1098/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,323. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010086212026
Filing Number
C528/4130/2026
Filing Date
20-05-2026
Registration No
C528/1098/2026
Registration Date
20-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
04th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SONI AND ORS
Adv. KAMALUDDIN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
ANKUSH
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
DEEPAK
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
AMRITA
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
AKASH
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
PRAVEEN KUMAR
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
ANIL
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
NEKI RAM ALIAS NEGI RAM
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
MAHAKWATI
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
MADHU
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
SUSHIL
Adv. MOHD SAFDAR
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
Case Summary: Soni and Others v. State of Uttarakhand (C528/1098/2026) The Uttarakhand High Court allowed compounding applications under Section 528 BNSS and quashed criminal proceedings arising from two FIRs (0753 and 0754 of 2022) filed on the same day relating to the same village incident. The court found that all parties from Village Bijholi had settled their disputes, cordial relations were restored, injuries were non-life-threatening, and all offenses carried sentences under seven years. Applying Supreme Court guidelines from State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan, the court determined continuation served no useful purpose. The accused were ordered to plant 200 protected trees as a restorative condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Soni and Others v. State of Uttarakhand (C528/1098/2026) The Uttarakhand High Court allowed compounding applications under Section 528 BNSS and quashed criminal proceedings arising from two FIRs (0753 and 0754 of 2022) filed on the same day relating to the same village incident. The court found that all parties from Village Bijholi had settled their disputes, cordial relations were restored, injuries were non-life-threatening, and all offenses carried sentences under seven years. Applying Supreme Court guidelines from State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan, the court determined continuation served no useful purpose. The accused were ordered to plant 200 protected trees as a restorative condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts