SONI AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1098/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,323. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010086212026

Filing Number

C528/4130/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1098/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,323

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONI AND ORS

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.ANKUSH

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  3. 3.DEEPAK

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  4. 4.AMRITA

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  5. 5.AKASH

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  6. 6.PRAVEEN KUMAR

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  7. 7.ANIL

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  8. 8.NEKI RAM ALIAS NEGI RAM

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  9. 9.MAHAKWATI

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  10. 10.MADHU

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  11. 11.SUSHIL

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    Case Summary: Soni and Others v. State of Uttarakhand (C528/1098/2026) The Uttarakhand High Court allowed compounding applications under Section 528 BNSS and quashed criminal proceedings arising from two FIRs (0753 and 0754 of 2022) filed on the same day relating to the same village incident. The court found that all parties from Village Bijholi had settled their disputes, cordial relations were restored, injuries were non-life-threatening, and all offenses carried sentences under seven years. Applying Supreme Court guidelines from State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan, the court determined continuation served no useful purpose. The accused were ordered to plant 200 protected trees as a restorative condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1098/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Soni and Others v. State of Uttarakhand (C528/1098/2026) The Uttarakhand High Court allowed compounding applications under Section 528 BNSS and quashed criminal proceedings arising from two FIRs (0753 and 0754 of 2022) filed on the same day relating to the same village incident. The court found that all parties from Village Bijholi had settled their disputes, cordial relations were restored, injuries were non-life-threatening, and all offenses carried sentences under seven years. Applying Supreme Court guidelines from State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan, the court determined continuation served no useful purpose. The accused were ordered to plant 200 protected trees as a restorative condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case