RAVI KUMAR AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1091/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,452/149,308/149,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010086192026

Filing Number

C528/4129/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1091/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,452/149,308/149,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KUMAR AND ORS

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SUSHIL KUMAR

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

  3. 3.ARJUN

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

  4. 4.BINOD ALIAS VINOD

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

  5. 5.DINESH KUMAR

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

  6. 6.GULLU ALIAS BITTU

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

  7. 7.VED PRAKASH

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

  8. 8.AWARSHER

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

  9. 9.JITENDRA NATH

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

  10. 10.SAVITA

    Adv. KAMALUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    Case Summary: Ravi Kumar and Others v. State of Uttarakhand (2026:UHC:4489) The Uttarakhand High Court allowed compounding applications filed by parties to two related FIRs (Nos. 753-754 of 2022) involving rioting and simple hurt charges from Village Bijholi. Finding that the parties had settled their dispute, all injuries were non-life-threatening, offences were minor (punishable under 7 years), and both informant and victim no longer wished to pursue trial, Justice Rakesh Thapliyal quashed both criminal proceedings under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, applying Supreme Court guidelines favoring settlement in cases of predominantly civil nature. As a condition, parties undertook to plant 200 protected trees in their village. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1091/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ravi Kumar and Others v. State of Uttarakhand (2026:UHC:4489) The Uttarakhand High Court allowed compounding applications filed by parties to two related FIRs (Nos. 753-754 of 2022) involving rioting and simple hurt charges from Village Bijholi. Finding that the parties had settled their dispute, all injuries were non-life-threatening, offences were minor (punishable under 7 years), and both informant and victim no longer wished to pursue trial, Justice Rakesh Thapliyal quashed both criminal proceedings under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, applying Supreme Court guidelines favoring settlement in cases of predominantly civil nature. As a condition, parties undertook to plant 200 protected trees in their village. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case