GEETA DEVI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1331/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 29th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010085382026
Filing Number
WPSS/4439/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1331/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
MISC ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GEETA DEVI
Adv. MOHIT KUMAR KASHYAP,MANJU BAHUGUNA,MANJU BAHUGUNA, ,ANUJ SINGH KUNJWAL,MANJU BAHUGUNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.JOINT DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.SMT BHARTI DEVI
Adv. ANKUSH KUMAR TYAGI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
The court disposed of Geeta Devi's petition challenging the award of the Teelu Rauteli Purashkar to Smt. Bharti Devi by permitting her to file a representation to the Director within ten days, to be decided within six weeks thereafter. The court upheld the state's submission that marks awarded to Smt. Bharti Devi were justified under policy provisions for Anganwari workers in centers with no malnourished cases, while ensuring Smt. Bharti Devi receives a hearing opportunity before any adverse order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
25-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
20-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/1331/2026
The court disposed of Geeta Devi's petition challenging the award of the Teelu Rauteli Purashkar to Smt. Bharti Devi by permitting her to file a representation to the Director within ten days, to be decided within six weeks thereafter. The court upheld the state's submission that marks awarded to Smt. Bharti Devi were justified under policy provisions for Anganwari workers in centers with no malnourished cases, while ensuring Smt. Bharti Devi receives a hearing opportunity before any adverse order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts