ADITYA TYGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/308/2024
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010084432024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA/4619/2024
Filing Date
07-06-2024
Registration No
CRLA/308/2024
Registration Date
07-06-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADITYA TYGI
Adv. VIVEK PATHAK,DISHA VASHISTH,DISHA VASHISTH, DISHA VASHISTH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2024 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 20-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 15-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
Orders
Summary: Bail application granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed bail for Aditya Tyagi, who was convicted under Section 8/22 of the NDPS Act, 1985, finding serious procedural irregularities in the prosecution case—specifically that an FIR number was recorded in the arrest memo prepared at the spot, despite the FIR being lodged much later. The appellant was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties, with sentence execution suspended pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Bail application granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed bail for Aditya Tyagi, who was convicted under Section 8/22 of the NDPS Act, 1985, finding serious procedural irregularities in the prosecution case—specifically that an FIR number was recorded in the arrest memo prepared at the spot, despite the FIR being lodged much later. The appellant was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties, with sentence execution suspended pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts