MANGAL SINGH MATURA vs PRASHANT ARYA DISTRICT MAGISTRATE — CLCON/283/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010084172026
Filing Number
CLCON/4382/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
CLCON/283/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANGAL SINGH MATURA
Adv. DINESH GAHATORI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRASHANT ARYA DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
-
2.MUKTA MISHRA
-
3.JAI BHARAT SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: CLCON/283/2026 The court rejected the contempt petition filed by Mangal Singh Matura against the District Magistrate and respondents. The court found no contempt because the petitioner had ceased working with the Child Development and Nutrition Department as of 31.12.2025, making an interim order (passed on 20.02.2026) directing non-disturbance from service moot and inapplicable. The petitioner may pursue his claims in the underlying writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
03-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
29-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
20-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CLCON/283/2026
Case Summary: CLCON/283/2026 The court rejected the contempt petition filed by Mangal Singh Matura against the District Magistrate and respondents. The court found no contempt because the petitioner had ceased working with the Child Development and Nutrition Department as of 31.12.2025, making an interim order (passed on 20.02.2026) directing non-disturbance from service moot and inapplicable. The petitioner may pursue his claims in the underlying writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts