MANGAL SINGH MATURA vs PRASHANT ARYA DISTRICT MAGISTRATE — CLCON/283/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010084172026
Filing Number
CLCON/4382/2026
Filing Date
18-05-2026
Registration No
CLCON/283/2026
Registration Date
18-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANGAL SINGH MATURA
Adv. DINESH GAHATORI
Respondent(s)
PRASHANT ARYA DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
MUKTA MISHRA
JAI BHARAT SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 03-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 29-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: CLCON/283/2026 The court rejected the contempt petition filed by Mangal Singh Matura against the District Magistrate and respondents. The court found no contempt because the petitioner had ceased working with the Child Development and Nutrition Department as of 31.12.2025, making an interim order (passed on 20.02.2026) directing non-disturbance from service moot and inapplicable. The petitioner may pursue his claims in the underlying writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CLCON/283/2026 The court rejected the contempt petition filed by Mangal Singh Matura against the District Magistrate and respondents. The court found no contempt because the petitioner had ceased working with the Child Development and Nutrition Department as of 31.12.2025, making an interim order (passed on 20.02.2026) directing non-disturbance from service moot and inapplicable. The petitioner may pursue his claims in the underlying writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts