POOJA PANDEY vs ASSISTANT COLLECTOR — WPMS/1428/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010083412026

Filing Number

WPMS/4339/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1428/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POOJA PANDEY

    Adv. C K SHARMA,NITIN TEWARI,NITIN TEWARI, ,NITIN TEWARI

  2. 2.MUSAFIR

  3. 3.POOJA RANA

  4. 4.SUNIL PANDEY

  5. 5.NANDAN SINGH BHANDARI

  6. 6.UMESH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSISTANT COLLECTOR

  2. 2.SRI RAJ KUMAR SINGH RANA

  3. 3.SRI GOVIND SINGH RANA

    Adv. SHIVANGI GANGWAR (FOR CAVEATOR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The writ petition was dismissed in-limine on the ground of lack of locus standi. The petitioners challenged an Assistant Collector's order dated 11.05.2026 that made Committee of Management members with share deposits below Rs.1000/- ineligible to continue as members under the Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004. The court found that the petitioners were not themselves Committee members and therefore not adversely affected by the order, rendering them without standing to challenge it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1428/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition was dismissed in-limine on the ground of lack of locus standi. The petitioners challenged an Assistant Collector's order dated 11.05.2026 that made Committee of Management members with share deposits below Rs.1000/- ineligible to continue as members under the Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004. The court found that the petitioners were not themselves Committee members and therefore not adversely affected by the order, rendering them without standing to challenge it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case