RAJEEV TYAGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1044/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010082962026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
C528/3972/2026
Filing Date
15-05-2026
Registration No
C528/1044/2026
Registration Date
15-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJEEV TYAGI
Adv. RAJAT MITTAL
RAJEEV SHARMA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
SRI PANKAJ GUPTA
SRI KAMAL KANT GARG
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/1044/2026 Rajeev Tyagi and Rajeev Sharma, directors of M/s Markx Infra Homes Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition to quash a chargesheet under Section 420 IPC (cheating) alleging they sold flats without executing sale deeds. They contended the dispute was purely civil—the respondents invested funds with registered agreements as security, were repaid in full, but refused to cancel agreements. The court found the applicants' submissions meritorious and stayed further criminal proceedings as an interim measure, issuing notices to respondents for their response on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/1044/2026 Rajeev Tyagi and Rajeev Sharma, directors of M/s Markx Infra Homes Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition to quash a chargesheet under Section 420 IPC (cheating) alleging they sold flats without executing sale deeds. They contended the dispute was purely civil—the respondents invested funds with registered agreements as security, were repaid in full, but refused to cancel agreements. The court found the applicants' submissions meritorious and stayed further criminal proceedings as an interim measure, issuing notices to respondents for their response on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts