ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD vs CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN — WPMS/1409/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010082752026

Filing Number

WPMS/4310/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1409/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD

    Adv. SIDDHARTH JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN

  2. 2.MEHTAB

  3. 3.MEHTAB

  4. 4.SHABNAM PARVIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court disposed of ICICI Home Finance's writ petitions challenging the Chief Judicial Magistrate's delay in deciding their Section 14 SARFAESI Act applications for possession of secured assets. The court directed the Magistrate to decide the pending applications expeditiously, citing the statutory 30-day timeline mandated under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1409/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of ICICI Home Finance's writ petitions challenging the Chief Judicial Magistrate's delay in deciding their Section 14 SARFAESI Act applications for possession of secured assets. The court directed the Magistrate to decide the pending applications expeditiously, citing the statutory 30-day timeline mandated under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case