ARIF AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1043/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,323,504,506. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010082702026

Filing Number

C528/3962/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1043/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARIF AND ORS

    Adv. GAURAV SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.NASEEM AHMAD

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/1043/2026 In this petition to quash criminal proceedings, Justice Alok Mahra found merit in applicants' contentions that the assault FIR lodged by Naseem Ahmad was retaliatory and an abuse of process given complainant's history of filing dismissed complaints and ongoing fraud case against applicants. The court issued notices to respondent, stayed further proceedings in Criminal Case No.97 of 2025 before the trial magistrate pending hearing, and listed the matter for subsequent adjudication on merits after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1043/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1043/2026 In this petition to quash criminal proceedings, Justice Alok Mahra found merit in applicants' contentions that the assault FIR lodged by Naseem Ahmad was retaliatory and an abuse of process given complainant's history of filing dismissed complaints and ongoing fraud case against applicants. The court issued notices to respondent, stayed further proceedings in Criminal Case No.97 of 2025 before the trial magistrate pending hearing, and listed the matter for subsequent adjudication on merits after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case