AMJAD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/819/2026

Case under Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3/5/11. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010082502026

Filing Number

BA1/3954/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

BA1/819/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3/5/11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMJAD

    Adv. GAURAV SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: BA1/819/2026 - Amjad v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Amjad, who was arrested under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007. The court found that Amjad was not named in the original FIR and was implicated based primarily on suspicion and hearsay allegations during investigation, with no independent witnesses placing him at the scene. The applicant was ordered released on personal bond with two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/819/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/819/2026 - Amjad v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Amjad, who was arrested under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007. The court found that Amjad was not named in the original FIR and was implicated based primarily on suspicion and hearsay allegations during investigation, with no independent witnesses placing him at the scene. The applicant was ordered released on personal bond with two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case