SANJAY GUPTA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/817/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010082442026
Filing Number
BA1/3951/2026
Filing Date
15-05-2026
Registration No
BA1/817/2026
Registration Date
15-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
19th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAY GUPTA
Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: BA1/817/2026 - Sanjay Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sanjay Gupta, who was in judicial custody under NDPS Act charges (Sections 8/20/29) for an alleged ganja recovery. The court found that no recovery was made from Gupta's possession, he was not named in the original FIR, and the contraband was recovered from co-accused Sushil Kumar Sahani's vehicle—who had already been granted bail. Finding the cases on parity and absent direct evidence against the applicant, the court allowed the bail application, ordering release on personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA1/817/2026 - Sanjay Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sanjay Gupta, who was in judicial custody under NDPS Act charges (Sections 8/20/29) for an alleged ganja recovery. The court found that no recovery was made from Gupta's possession, he was not named in the original FIR, and the contraband was recovered from co-accused Sushil Kumar Sahani's vehicle—who had already been granted bail. Finding the cases on parity and absent direct evidence against the applicant, the court allowed the bail application, ordering release on personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts