SANJAY GUPTA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/817/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010082442026

Filing Number

BA1/3951/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

BA1/817/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY GUPTA

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: BA1/817/2026 - Sanjay Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sanjay Gupta, who was in judicial custody under NDPS Act charges (Sections 8/20/29) for an alleged ganja recovery. The court found that no recovery was made from Gupta's possession, he was not named in the original FIR, and the contraband was recovered from co-accused Sushil Kumar Sahani's vehicle—who had already been granted bail. Finding the cases on parity and absent direct evidence against the applicant, the court allowed the bail application, ordering release on personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/817/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/817/2026 - Sanjay Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sanjay Gupta, who was in judicial custody under NDPS Act charges (Sections 8/20/29) for an alleged ganja recovery. The court found that no recovery was made from Gupta's possession, he was not named in the original FIR, and the contraband was recovered from co-accused Sushil Kumar Sahani's vehicle—who had already been granted bail. Finding the cases on parity and absent direct evidence against the applicant, the court allowed the bail application, ordering release on personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case