REHAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/816/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109(1),190,191(2),191(3),333,351(2),352,61(2),3(5). Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Next hearing 05-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010082312026

Filing Number

BA1/3949/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

BA1/816/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109(1),190,191(2),191(3),333,351(2),352,61(2),3(5)
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 3/25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REHAN

    Adv. SANJAY BHATT,PREM PRAKASH BHATT,PREM PRAKASH BHATT, ,PREM PRAKASH BHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  3. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case BA1/816/2026 Summary: Rehan's bail application was adjourned. The applicant, in judicial custody for FIR No. 0263 of 2025 involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act, argued parity with a co-accused already granted bail. The State opposed, noting the applicant was specifically named in the FIR. The court called for State objections and listed the matter for 05.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/816/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case BA1/816/2026 Summary: Rehan's bail application was adjourned. The applicant, in judicial custody for FIR No. 0263 of 2025 involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act, argued parity with a co-accused already granted bail. The State opposed, noting the applicant was specifically named in the FIR. The court called for State objections and listed the matter for 05.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case