ISLAM vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/815/2026

Case under Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3,5/11. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010082282026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/3947/2026

Filing Date

15-05-2026

Registration No

BA1/815/2026

Registration Date

15-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3,5/11

Petitioner(s)

ISLAM

Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

19-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

19-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Case Summary: Islam v. State of Uttarakhand (BA1/815/2026) Islam's bail application under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act was granted. The court found that no forensic report had been submitted to substantiate that the recovered meat was beef, and considering the overall facts—including the applicant's lack of criminal history, absence of independent witnesses in recovery, and a four-hour delay in FIR lodging—Islam made out a fit case for bail. He was released on personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Islam v. State of Uttarakhand (BA1/815/2026) Islam's bail application under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act was granted. The court found that no forensic report had been submitted to substantiate that the recovered meat was beef, and considering the overall facts—including the applicant's lack of criminal history, absence of independent witnesses in recovery, and a four-hour delay in FIR lodging—Islam made out a fit case for bail. He was released on personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case