M/S S. KUMAR AND COMPANY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — ARBAP/34/2025
Case under Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11(6). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010079802025
Filing Number
ARBAP/3951/2025
Filing Date
04-06-2025
Registration No
ARBAP/34/2025
Registration Date
04-06-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
ARBITRATION APPLICATION(SECTION-11) ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S S. KUMAR AND COMPANY
Adv. NAGESH AGGARWAL
SUNIL KUMAR ARORA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
COMMISSIONER GARHWAL MANDAL PAURI
Adv. C.S.C.
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR
Adv. C.S.C.
MELA OFFICER HEALTH KUMBH MELA YEAR 202 THROUGH INCHARGE OFFICER CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER HARIDWAR
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 14-11-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 31-10-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 19-09-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 01-09-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
The High Court of Uttarakhand directed the State Government to appoint a new Arbitrator to resolve disputes between M/s S. Kumar & Company and the State, as the originally designated arbitrator (Mr. Vinay Shankar Pandey) had a conflict of interest, having served as Mela Adhikari during the relevant period. The appointment must be completed within four weeks, with both parties consenting to this arrangement under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Uttarakhand directed the State Government to appoint a new Arbitrator to resolve disputes between M/s S. Kumar & Company and the State, as the originally designated arbitrator (Mr. Vinay Shankar Pandey) had a conflict of interest, having served as Mela Adhikari during the relevant period. The appointment must be completed within four weeks, with both parties consenting to this arrangement under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts