KALAWATI YADAV vs BHAGWAN SINGH NEGI Advocate - VIKAS BAHUGUNA — CLR/45/2021

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010078122021

Filing Number

CLR/3264/2021

Filing Date

09-Jul-2021

Registration No

CLR/45/2021

Registration Date

09-Jul-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISIONS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION 25 PROVISO OF PROVINCIAL SMALL CAUSE COURT ACT,1887 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALAWATI YADAV

    Adv. GANESH KANDPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGWAN SINGH NEGI Advocate - VIKAS BAHUGUNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Summary of CLR/45/2021 The High Court dismissed Kalawati Yadav's revision petition as infructuous on 08.05.2026. The respondent Bhagwan Singh Negi had already taken possession of the suit property in compliance with the lower court's order dated 03.04.2021, and the petitioner did not dispute this fact, rendering the revision moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

  5. 12-Jul-2021

    Sri Narayan Singh Dhanik, J.View PDF

  6. 12-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLR/45/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CLR/45/2021 The High Court dismissed Kalawati Yadav's revision petition as infructuous on 08.05.2026. The respondent Bhagwan Singh Negi had already taken possession of the suit property in compliance with the lower court's order dated 03.04.2021, and the petitioner did not dispute this fact, rendering the revision moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case