DEVENDER vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/841/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010076172026

Filing Number

WPCRL/3638/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/841/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVENDER

    Adv. ABHILASHA TOMAR,ARUNDHATI SATI,ARUNDHATI SATI, ,ARUNDHATI SATI

  2. 2.SHRUTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.ABHIMANYU VERMA

  4. 4.JYOTI VERMA

  5. 5.SHIVANGI VERMA

  6. 6.SAURABH VERMA

  7. 7.SHUBHAM VERMA

  8. 8.ABHISHEK YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    Summary: The court granted protection to petitioners Devender and Shruti, who married on 06.05.2026 at a temple in Kashipur. Since their age and marriage were undisputed, the court directed the SSP to assess any threat perception from family members (respondents 3-8) and take appropriate protective steps if threats exist, while also instructing the SHO to advise respondents against taking the law into their own hands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/841/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted protection to petitioners Devender and Shruti, who married on 06.05.2026 at a temple in Kashipur. Since their age and marriage were undisputed, the court directed the SSP to assess any threat perception from family members (respondents 3-8) and take appropriate protective steps if threats exist, while also instructing the SHO to advise respondents against taking the law into their own hands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case