ANIKET vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1240/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010076102026

Filing Number

WPSS/3974/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1240/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIKET

    Adv. AMAR MURTI SHUKLA,LATA NEGI,LATA NEGI, ,ANAND SINGH,LATA NEGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.SEHKARI CHINI MILL

    Adv. VINAY BHATT

  3. 3.MANAGING DIRECTOR

    Adv. VINAY BHATT

  4. 4.GENERAL MANAGER

    Adv. VINAY BHATT

  5. 5.UTTARAKHAND SEHKARI CHINI MILL SANGH LTD

    Adv. VINAY BHATT

  6. 6.ARAFAT SIDDIQUE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: WPSS/1240/2026 Aniket sought compassionate appointment following his father's death while employed as a laborer at Nadehi Cooperative Sugar Mill Limited, but the competent authority failed to consider his application. The court disposed of the writ petition and directed Respondent No. 4 to decide on the petitioner's compassionate appointment application in accordance with law within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1240/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSS/1240/2026 Aniket sought compassionate appointment following his father's death while employed as a laborer at Nadehi Cooperative Sugar Mill Limited, but the competent authority failed to consider his application. The court disposed of the writ petition and directed Respondent No. 4 to decide on the petitioner's compassionate appointment application in accordance with law within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case