MOHD MOBIN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/349/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010075852026

Filing Number

CRLR/3620/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRLR/349/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISIONS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD MOBIN

    Adv. PRIYA MEWARI,GIRISH KUMAR ARYA,GIRISH KUMAR ARYA, ,GIRISH KUMAR ARYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SHRI GOPAL SINGH KHATI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLR 349/2026 Mohd Mobin challenged his conviction for three months simple imprisonment and Rs. 3,20,000 fine (confirmed on appeal). The High Court admitted the criminal revision and allowed his exemption application, permitting him to remain on bail without surrendering, subject to paying Rs. 50,000 to the complainant within one month. The case is listed for hearing on 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/349/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLR 349/2026 Mohd Mobin challenged his conviction for three months simple imprisonment and Rs. 3,20,000 fine (confirmed on appeal). The High Court admitted the criminal revision and allowed his exemption application, permitting him to remain on bail without surrendering, subject to paying Rs. 50,000 to the complainant within one month. The case is listed for hearing on 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case