MANJEET SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/828/2026
Case under Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act No. 21 of 2000) Section 66,67(A). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010075382026
Filing Number
WPCRL/3595/2026
Filing Date
05-05-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/828/2026
Registration Date
05-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
FIR QUASHING ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANJEET SINGH
Adv. ANIL ANTHWAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
SMT. RAJKUMARI
Adv. DHEERAJ JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPCRL 828/2026 The court allowed petitioner Manjeet Singh's writ petition and compounding application to quash FIR No. 0005 of 2026 (registered at P.S. Badkot, Uttarkashi) for offences under Sections 66, 67(A) IT Act and Section 77 BNS 2023. The court found that the FIR arose from a misunderstanding between the petitioner and complainant (known through Instagram), and since the complainant settled the dispute and withdrew her complaint, no useful purpose remained in pursuing the investigation. The FIR was accordingly quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPCRL 828/2026 The court allowed petitioner Manjeet Singh's writ petition and compounding application to quash FIR No. 0005 of 2026 (registered at P.S. Badkot, Uttarkashi) for offences under Sections 66, 67(A) IT Act and Section 77 BNS 2023. The court found that the FIR arose from a misunderstanding between the petitioner and complainant (known through Instagram), and since the complainant settled the dispute and withdrew her complaint, no useful purpose remained in pursuing the investigation. The FIR was accordingly quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts