BHUWANESHWARI RAWAT vs RASHMI PAL — C528/936/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010075332026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528/3590/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

C528/936/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138

Petitioner(s)

BHUWANESHWARI RAWAT

Adv. RISHAB RANGHAR

Respondent(s)

RASHMI PAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

07-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: C528/936/2026 – Bhuwaneshwari Rawat v. Rashmi Pal The court directed expedited proceedings in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 cheque dishonour case filed in June 2022, which remained pending for four years. The respondent's repeated absences and bail violations caused undue delay, violating the statutory mandate for six-month trial completion. The court ordered the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months from the order date without granting unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/936/2026 – Bhuwaneshwari Rawat v. Rashmi Pal The court directed expedited proceedings in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 cheque dishonour case filed in June 2022, which remained pending for four years. The respondent's repeated absences and bail violations caused undue delay, violating the statutory mandate for six-month trial completion. The court ordered the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months from the order date without granting unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case