MANGAL SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/934/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 326,506,34. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010075242026
Filing Number
C528/3581/2026
Filing Date
05-05-2026
Registration No
C528/934/2026
Registration Date
05-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANGAL SINGH
Adv. PRINCE CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
GURPREET SINGH ALIAS GOPI
HARJEET SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/934/2026 Mangal Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking expedited proceedings in Criminal Case No. 566 of 2023 (assault and criminal intimidation charges under IPC Sections 326, 506, 34) against Gurpreet Singh and Harjeet Singh, pending before the Judicial Magistrate in Jaspur, Udham Singh Nagar. Despite three years passing since cognizance in July 2023, only 5 of 12 prosecution witnesses had been examined, causing hardship to the NRI applicant. The court allowed the application, directing the trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously within one year without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/934/2026 Mangal Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking expedited proceedings in Criminal Case No. 566 of 2023 (assault and criminal intimidation charges under IPC Sections 326, 506, 34) against Gurpreet Singh and Harjeet Singh, pending before the Judicial Magistrate in Jaspur, Udham Singh Nagar. Despite three years passing since cognizance in July 2023, only 5 of 12 prosecution witnesses had been examined, causing hardship to the NRI applicant. The court allowed the application, directing the trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously within one year without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts