ROHIT PALDIYA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /271/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 504. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010075102024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA /4120/2024
Filing Date
20-05-2024
Registration No
CRLA /271/2024
Registration Date
20-05-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROHIT PALDIYA
Adv. AHRAR BAIG,SONALI SINGH,SONALI SINGH, ,NISHAT INTEZAR,MUKUL DANGI (LEGAL AID),DIVYA JAIN,SHWETA JAIN,SONALI SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS (AFTER FRESH) -23
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-06-2024 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 | |
| 11-12-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS (AFTER FRESH) -23 | |
| 18-09-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 07-08-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 22-05-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to appellant Rohit Paldiya in Criminal Appeal No. 271 of 2024, who was convicted under IPC Sections 323, 376(2)(n), 504, 506 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court suspended the sentence during the appeal's pendency and ordered his release on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to appellant Rohit Paldiya in Criminal Appeal No. 271 of 2024, who was convicted under IPC Sections 323, 376(2)(n), 504, 506 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court suspended the sentence during the appeal's pendency and ordered his release on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts