BHUWNESHWAR PRASAD DEVRANI vs SANGEETA BIJALWAN — WPMS/1274/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010075052026

Filing Number

WPMS/3934/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1274/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUWNESHWAR PRASAD DEVRANI

    Adv. RISHAB RANGHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGEETA BIJALWAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    WPMS/1274/2026 Summary: The court granted an 85-year-old defendant's writ petition seeking expedited hearing in an underlying civil suit pending since 2018. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal disposed of the petition by directing the trial court to conduct hearings on a day-to-day basis and complete the suit within three months, considering the petitioner's advanced age and that pleadings were already exchanged and issues framed in 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

WPMS/1274/2026 Summary: The court granted an 85-year-old defendant's writ petition seeking expedited hearing in an underlying civil suit pending since 2018. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal disposed of the petition by directing the trial court to conduct hearings on a day-to-day basis and complete the suit within three months, considering the petitioner's advanced age and that pleadings were already exchanged and issues framed in 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case