MAYANK TYAGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPCRL/826/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 197(1)(C),336(4),353(2). Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010075032026
Filing Number
WPCRL/3570/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/826/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
FIR QUASHING ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAYANK TYAGI
Adv. PANKAJ MIGLANI,LALIT MIGLANI,LALIT MIGLANI, ,LALIT MIGLANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
-
3.INVESTIGATING OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
-
4.KAISHAV THARWAL
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Part Heard Matters -132
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
The case was adjourned to June 10, 2026. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal questioned the locus standi of petitioner Mayank Tyagi (a practicing lawyer filing on behalf of others despite not being a victim or affected party) and directed inquiry into potential professional misconduct regarding his filing of the petition and subsequent media statements publicizing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCRL/826/2026
The case was adjourned to June 10, 2026. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal questioned the locus standi of petitioner Mayank Tyagi (a practicing lawyer filing on behalf of others despite not being a victim or affected party) and directed inquiry into potential professional misconduct regarding his filing of the petition and subsequent media statements publicizing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts