MAYANK TYAGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPCRL/826/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 197(1)(C),336(4),353(2). Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010075032026

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

WPCRL/3570/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/826/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 197(1)(C),336(4),353(2)
Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act No. 21 of 2000) Section 67

Petitioner(s)

MAYANK TYAGI

Adv. PANKAJ MIGLANI,LALIT MIGLANI,LALIT MIGLANI, ,LALIT MIGLANI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

INVESTIGATING OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

KAISHAV THARWAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

07-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

10-06-2026

PART HEARD MATTERS -132

05-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

08-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

05-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

The case was adjourned to June 10, 2026. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal questioned the locus standi of petitioner Mayank Tyagi (a practicing lawyer filing on behalf of others despite not being a victim or affected party) and directed inquiry into potential professional misconduct regarding his filing of the petition and subsequent media statements publicizing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The case was adjourned to June 10, 2026. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal questioned the locus standi of petitioner Mayank Tyagi (a practicing lawyer filing on behalf of others despite not being a victim or affected party) and directed inquiry into potential professional misconduct regarding his filing of the petition and subsequent media statements publicizing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case