WINDLAS BIOTECH LIMITED vs DELIUS PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED — ARBAP/31/2023

Case under Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11(6). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th August 2023.

CNR: UKHC010074902023

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

ARBAP/3240/2023

Filing Date

16-05-2023

Registration No

ARBAP/31/2023

Registration Date

16-05-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

ARBITRATION APPLICATION(SECTION-11) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

04th August 2023

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11(6)

Petitioner(s)

WINDLAS BIOTECH LIMITED

Adv. PULAK RAJ MULLICK,DEEPAK JOSHI,DEEPAK JOSHI, ,SAHIL MULLICK,DEEPAK JOSHI

Respondent(s)

DELIUS PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED

Adv. VISHWAST KANDPAL,AMANJOT S CHADHA 1123

DIGVIJAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAWA

Adv. VISHWAST KANDPAL,AMANJOT S CHADHA DHARMENDER BHAN

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

19-05-2023

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

04-08-2023

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

07-07-2023

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

22-05-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

On 22.05.2026, the court disposed of Windlas Biotech Limited's Urgency Application (IA No. 04 of 2026) in ARBAP/31/2023 against Delius Pharmaceuticals and Digvijay Kumar Shrivastawa. The case was adjourned for three weeks, and the applicant's counsel was directed to inform the respondents' counsel of the order in writing, as they were absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

On 22.05.2026, the court disposed of Windlas Biotech Limited's Urgency Application (IA No. 04 of 2026) in ARBAP/31/2023 against Delius Pharmaceuticals and Digvijay Kumar Shrivastawa. The case was adjourned for three weeks, and the applicant's counsel was directed to inform the respondents' counsel of the order in writing, as they were absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case