SHAMSHER vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA2/62/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22/27(A). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010074792026

Filing Number

BA2/3559/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

BA2/62/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22/27(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMSHER

    Adv. ABHISHEK JOSHI,SHIVAM GULATI,SHIVAM GULATI, ,SHIVAM GULATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: Shamsher v. State of Uttarakhand (BA2/62/2026) The court rejected Shamsher's second bail application in an NDPS Act case involving recovery of 3,41,568 capsules of Tramadol Hydrochloride from a godown where he was found present. The court found no substantial change in circumstances warranting a different outcome from the earlier rejected bail application (BA 850/2025), noting that questions regarding his knowledge and conscious possession require trial evidence and cannot be resolved at bail stage. The procedural defect in the arrest memo was deemed insufficient to override Section 37 NDPS Act rigors given the commercial quantity of contraband recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA2/62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shamsher v. State of Uttarakhand (BA2/62/2026) The court rejected Shamsher's second bail application in an NDPS Act case involving recovery of 3,41,568 capsules of Tramadol Hydrochloride from a godown where he was found present. The court found no substantial change in circumstances warranting a different outcome from the earlier rejected bail application (BA 850/2025), noting that questions regarding his knowledge and conscious possession require trial evidence and cannot be resolved at bail stage. The procedural defect in the arrest memo was deemed insufficient to override Section 37 NDPS Act rigors given the commercial quantity of contraband recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case