RAFAT SAYEEDA vs RAJESH KUMAR GOEL — SA/47/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010074512026
Filing Number
SA/3905/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
SA/47/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAFAT SAYEEDA
Adv. VINAY BHATT,MOHD SHAFY,MOHD SHAFY, ,MOHD SHAFY
-
2.TAYYAB SIDDIQUE
-
3.MOHD SALMAN SIDDIQUE
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR GOEL
-
2.FAIZAN SIDDIQUI(Legal Heir)2.
-
3.SMT ZAREEBA2.
-
4.NOORAIN
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jul-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
-
10-Jul-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF
Case Summary: SA/47/2026 Outcome: Second appeal admitted for hearing on substantial questions of law. The High Court admitted the defendants' second appeal challenging the First Appellate Court's judgment (dated 02.04.2026) that had decreed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction over a 14X20 feet vacant plot. The trial court had dismissed the suit when it proceeded ex parte after the defendant stopped participating. The court admitted the appeal on two substantial questions: (i) whether the plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence, and (ii) whether the trial court properly ignored unrebutted evidence. Status quo on the property is maintained pending next hearing on 10.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SA/47/2026
Case Summary: SA/47/2026 Outcome: Second appeal admitted for hearing on substantial questions of law. The High Court admitted the defendants' second appeal challenging the First Appellate Court's judgment (dated 02.04.2026) that had decreed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction over a 14X20 feet vacant plot. The trial court had dismissed the suit when it proceeded ex parte after the defendant stopped participating. The court admitted the appeal on two substantial questions: (i) whether the plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence, and (ii) whether the trial court properly ignored unrebutted evidence. Status quo on the property is maintained pending next hearing on 10.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts